Astro vs Webflow
Code-first freedom versus visual no-code building. Compare Astro's developer-centric approach with Webflow's designer-friendly platform.
Quick verdict: Choose Astro for full code control, no vendor lock-in, and maximum performance. Choose Webflow when designers need to build and iterate visually without developer involvement.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Astro | Webflow |
|---|---|---|
| Building Approach | Code (HTML, CSS, JS/TS) | Visual drag-and-drop designer |
| JavaScript Shipped | Zero by default | Webflow runtime + interactions JS |
| Hosting | Any host (self-hosted, CDN, cloud) | Webflow hosting only (or export) |
| Vendor Lock-in | None -- standard HTML/CSS/JS | High -- proprietary visual editor |
| CMS | Any headless CMS or Markdown | Built-in visual CMS |
| Custom Functionality | Unlimited (any npm package) | Limited to Webflow features + custom code embeds |
| Design Flexibility | Complete (write any CSS/Tailwind) | High within the visual editor |
| Animations | CSS animations, GSAP, any JS library | Built-in visual animation builder |
| E-commerce | Via integrations (Snipcart, Shopify API) | Built-in e-commerce (paid plan) |
| Pricing | Free (open source) + hosting | $14-39/month (site plans) |
Performance
Astro
- ✓Ships zero JavaScript by default -- only interactive islands load JS
- ✓You control every byte of CSS and JS that reaches the browser
- ✓Deploy to any edge CDN for global sub-100ms response times
- ✓Built-in image optimization with lazy loading and format conversion
- ✓Consistently scores 95-100 on Lighthouse performance audits
Webflow
- ●Generates clean HTML/CSS, but includes the Webflow runtime script
- ●Hosted on Webflow's CDN with decent global performance
- ●Interactions and animations add JavaScript that cannot be removed
- ●Image optimization available but less granular than Astro
- ●Lighthouse scores typically range from 75-90 depending on complexity
Developer and Designer Experience
Astro
Astro is built for developers who want complete control. You write standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with modern tooling -- TypeScript, Tailwind CSS, component frameworks, and the full npm ecosystem at your disposal.
Version control with Git means you can track every change, collaborate through pull requests, and roll back instantly. There is no proprietary editor -- you use VS Code or any text editor you prefer.
Webflow
Webflow is built for designers who think visually. Its canvas-based editor lets you build responsive layouts, add interactions, and manage content without writing code. The learning curve is steep for beginners, but experienced designers find it powerful.
The built-in CMS allows content teams to update text and media through a structured interface. However, you are limited to what Webflow supports -- custom server-side logic, complex APIs, or non-standard functionality requires workarounds or external tools.
Pricing
Astro
Astro is free and open source. Host a static site on Cloudflare Pages, Netlify, or GitHub Pages at no cost. Even high-traffic sites rarely exceed free-tier limits because static files are cheap to serve.
Your primary cost is development time. Once built, the site essentially runs for free with no recurring platform fees.
Webflow
Webflow site plans range from $14/month (basic) to $39/month (business). The CMS plan at $23/month adds dynamic content collections. E-commerce plans start at $29/month. Workspace plans for teams start at $28/month per seat.
Costs add up with multiple sites and team members. Over 3 years, a single Webflow CMS site costs roughly $830+ in platform fees alone, compared to $0-45 for Astro on a free host.
Best Use Cases
Choose Astro for
- →Maximum performance and Core Web Vitals scores
- →Projects requiring custom functionality or integrations
- →Teams with developer resources who want full control
- →Long-term projects where you want to avoid vendor lock-in
- →Multi-framework projects (mixing React, Vue, Svelte)
Choose Webflow for
- →Design-led teams who work visually
- →Rapid prototyping and design iteration
- →Marketing sites where designers own the publishing workflow
- →Small e-commerce stores with simple product catalogs
- →Projects where no developer is available
Our Verdict
Webflow is a powerful visual builder that lets designers create professional websites without writing code. It is particularly strong for teams where designers lead the web development process and need to iterate on layouts and interactions visually.
Astro wins on performance, flexibility, and long-term cost. Because you write standard code and own every file, there is no vendor lock-in and no monthly platform fee. You can deploy anywhere, integrate any tool, and build exactly what you need without platform constraints.
For businesses investing in a website that needs to perform at the highest level, scale without escalating costs, and remain fully under your control, Astro is the stronger foundation. If your team works visually and does not have developers, Webflow is a practical alternative.
Ready to Build with Astro?
Let us help you choose the right platform and build a website that performs.
Get My Free Platform Assessment